Pass Fun Forum

With the elimination of this provision, nonetheless, the Title IX Coordinator even now possesses the discretion to indication formal grievances in scenarios involving threats, serial predation, violence, or weapons. The Department disagrees with the recommendation to expand the proposed provision to include other situations these kinds of as alleged use of threats, violence, or weapons, since we are persuaded by commenters that leaving the Title IX Coordinator discretion to sign a official grievance is preferable to mandating circumstances under which a Title IX Coordinator must signal a formal grievance. As the proposed secure harbor pertaining to supportive measures is no for a longer time integrated in these ultimate polices, we do not revisit whether excluding elementary and secondary university recipients from this secure harbor was preferable to modifying the proposed protected harbor to also apply to elementary and secondary universities. Many commenters argued that the proposed risk-free harbor with regards to supportive steps basically made a barrier to giving supportive actions for elementary and secondary university victims simply because the provision used only to institutions of larger instruction, and requested the Department to modify the proposed rules to increase this supportive actions risk-free harbor to the elementary and secondary school context either by producing a separate harmless harbor with virtually similar language or by deleting the phrase "for institutions of greater education" in the proposed regulatory text.